Taiwan’s Low Fertility, Government Policies, & the 2024 Presidential Elections

https://focustaiwan.tw/politics/202312040019

The island nation of Taiwan has a population of 24 million, about half that of Spain and equal to that of Florida. Depending on who is reporting, the total fertility rate (TFR) in Taiwan ranges from 0.87 to 1.2. A TFR of 2.1 reflects the replacement rate for a country–that is, the number of births needed to maintain a country’s population. Taiwan has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world.

In the past decade, the government has taken active steps to reverse Taiwan’s low fertility rate. If it is unsuccessful, Taiwan will face a shrinking workforce and an aging population, which means less state revenue from taxes and more money spent on elderly care. A decreasing population also becomes a significant security issue with fewer people able to defend the country and keep the economy robust.

Over the past decade, the Kuomintang and the Democratic Progressive Party administrations implemented and expanded several policies to support working mothers. Here is a chronology of what a working mother has access to:

  • IVF. If she needs IVF treatment, the government will subsidize the first treatment at NT$100,000 (~$3,000, or about 1/2 to a 1/3 of the cost) and NT$60,000 (~$2,000) for the 2nd to the 6th treatment.
  • Pregnancy checkups. She can receive 7 days of paid leave for pregnancy checkups.
  • Birth bonus. Local governments give different amounts. If a mother gives birth in Taipei, she receives NT$40,000 ($1,250) as a birth bonus.
  • Maternity/paternity leave. The mother gets 8 weeks of paid leave. The father gets 7 days of paid leave, which he can also apply to pregnancy checkups.
  • Parental leave. Either the mother or father can get 6 months parental leave at 80% pay.
  • Care subsidies. The baby will get a monthly subsidy depending on who cares for him or her.
    • If a parent stays at home, the subsidy is NT$5,000/month (~$150) until the age of 6.
    • If a nanny (baomu) takes care of the child, whether in the child’s home or in her own home, or if the child is in a quasi-public daycare, the subsidy is NT$8,500 (~$265).
    • If the child is in a public daycare, the family gets $5,500/month (~$170).

The above list seems quite generous…and yet, women in Taiwan are not increasing their rate of having more babies.

On January 13, 2024, citizens will decide the next president of Taiwan. What are presidential candidates advocating? Let’s look at each one in turn:

LAI-CHING-TE of the DPP promises the world by advocating a mix of subsidies and strengthening the public care system for ages 0 to 22. They include:

  • Child subsidies
    • Public daycares–increase from NT$5,500 to NT$7,000/month
    • Quasi public daycares and nanny services–increase from NT$8,500 to NT$13,000/month
  • Care system
    • Longer daycare hours to align with working parents’ hours
    • Promote care services over winter and summer school vacation
    • Raise salaries of daycare workers and guarantee yearly salary raises based on seniority
    • Lower the teacher-student ratio.
    • Make parental leave more flexible
    • Encourage companies to open daycares

Lai Ching-te has additional ideas for the 6–18 and 18–22 category, which I won’t go into.

HOU YOU-IH of the Kuomintang proposes the following:

  • Provide NT$20,000 subsidy for freezing eggs; NT$2,000/year for storing the eggs for up to five years.
  • Raise the parental leave from 80% of salary to full salary
  • Make public childcare for children between 0 and 6 free
  • Raise subsidies for private childcare to NT$10,000/month
  • Check this one out: Give NT$1 million ($31,000) housing subsidy for families with three or more children.

KE WEN-JE of the Taiwan’s People’s Party suggests:

  • Give NT$50,000 to pregnant women at 3 months.
  • Then give NT$100,000 once the baby is born
  • Double the maternity paid leave to 14 weeks

Given this dizzying array of proposals, will it actually solve the low fertility issue? Let me chew on this for the next post.

In the meantime, let me end with this. Taiwan’s welfare regime is truly a hybrid system between the US (a liberal democracy) and Spain (a social democracy). There are social democratic elements in Taiwan’s proposals (it already has universal health care and proposals to strengthen public daycares are a step in this direction) but there are also liberal elements in the proposal (e.g., providing cash transfers to allow families to decide how they will use the money). The question is whether this hybrid approach is truly the best of both worlds or whether it falls short by failing to pursue one path fully.

Update 2/6/24

The writer in the comments section below refers to an Op Ed piece I wrote for the Taipei Times and which builds from the above post. You can find it here: Can Lai Solve the Low Birthrate?

6 responses to “Taiwan’s Low Fertility, Government Policies, & the 2024 Presidential Elections”

  1. Heidi Cephus Avatar
    Heidi Cephus

    So interesting! I would imagine that there is a balance between providing the supports that will help make it possible for those who want to have children to do so and providing an incentive for people to have children when they otherwise would not want them. I wonder about the long term impacts of these policies.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. hookhobie138 Avatar
    hookhobie138

    Ms. Huang, just read the article - Can Lai Solve the Low Birthrate ? – that was in our local rag called Taipei Times. Believe you’re going down the same blind alley that the ruling Liberal Progressives have followed re: low fertility rates.

    The problem is the mindsets of the younger gen. of women. They want careers,NOT family with kids. Plus many come from broken families and have witnessed first hand the problems of married life. This is not just a Twn problem, but a world-wide one. For years young women have been kept down, being pressured to raise families despite getting a quality education, sometimes better than that of their boyfriends/ future hasbeens. Throwing money at the problems is just pure waste.

    So pls. think about it and reconsider your agenda. It’s their preference, at least, until times change , and that’s the way I see it.

    J. ‘Hook’ Hobie

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ghuang345 Avatar

      Hello, ‘Hook,’ Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I will like to respond in more detail, but I am getting ready to move back to the states. I will write back in the next week.

      Like

  3. hookhobie138 Avatar
    hookhobie138

    Tks. Will be looking forward to it even if you disagree with me.

    Hook.

    Like

    1. ghuang345 Avatar

      Hi, Hook! I wrote back a couple of days ago, but perhaps you didn’t get the message because I didn’t put the response in “reply.”

      Like

  4. ghuang345 Avatar

    Hi, Hook,

    I am back in the US. There are some parts I agree with you and some parts where I think there is more nuance to the issue.

    Throwing money at the problems is just pure waste.

    There is an element of throwing money at the problem and seeing what sticks, but I think some of the policies are promising and others are not. As I mention in the most recent Strait Up podcast episode, the ideas of birth bonuses or subsidizing housing are DUMB ones. I also think that a 7 day paternal leave and a 56 day maternal leave is not a good idea for helping to share care duties in those early weeks. It sets a pattern from the beginning that the mother is the default caregiver.

    However, I do especially like the parental leave as a way of equalizing care.

    Believe you’re going down the same blind alley that the ruling Liberal Progressives have followed re: low fertility rates.

    I take issue with the implication that only the DPP is liberally progressive on low fertility rates. The KMT advocated raising parental leave from 80% salary to 100% while the TPP advocated doubling the maternity paid leave to 14 weeks to be on par with European countries. All three parties thus reflect “liberal progressive” policies.

    I 100% agree with you that there are many issues contributing to low fertility, and I don’t have an agenda of persuading women to have children just to resolve the low fertility. Indeed, the factors behind why women/couples are not having children are numerous including the reasons you mention above.

    In the end I concluded that the policies will not solve the problem, but my intention was not to say that we should throw more money at the problem. Indeed, I spoke of a larger cultural shift needed in Taiwan that is more difficult for the government to resolve.

    Thank you for taking the time to engage with me on this issue.

    Like

Leave a comment